Tag Archives: television

Remembering David Carradine and ‘Q: The Winged Serpent’

7 Jun

464966208_0ed79b167b

June 7th, 2009-

There have been a fair number of articles and retrospectives in the past few days looking back over the career of veteran David Carradine, who died last Wednesday in Thailand. One of the most interesting was a eulogy by Carradine’s friend and fellow actor Michael Madsen which you can find HERE. Elsewhere, it’s all Kung-Fu this, and Kwai Chang Caine that and for the younger generation he’s mostly just Bill who Uma killed by edict of Tarantino. Sort of strange to be remembered for so few performances when your filmography contains over 200 acting credits. Continue reading

The rest of ‘Pushing Daisies’ begins airing TONIGHT!!

30 May

00020051

The facts are these:

In September of 2007, ABC debuted a new and quirky series called Pushing Daisies. It was both a critical and ratings darling during it’s freshman months. Then the writer’s strike happened, and Daisies finished its first season with a paltry 9 episodes. When it returned, it failed to get the ratings necessary to keep ABC from canceling it and in December of 2008, after two partial seasons, the axe was dropped on Pushing Daises. At the time, ABC didn’t even finish airing the final three episodes. Since that time, ABC has allowed show-runner Fuller to go back and modify the final episode a bit so that it functions more as a series finale than simply a season cap. And now, they are dropping Pushing Daisies in the 10 pm slot on Saturday night for the following three weeks with as little publicity and fanfare as possible.

I don’t think even the Pie-maker can resurrect this one, but its nice to at least get a chance to say our goodbyes.

I didnt come to show when it first aired (as I seem to do with so much television) but caught it when it hit dvd. And it was really something unique. Creating a world that blended storybooks and comic books, Pushing Daisies gave us a wonderful and distinct cast of characters, a sweet and thoughtful love story and some of the best dialogue on television today. It was a zinger for sure, and original, which was itself a major accomplishment for network t.v.

The cast is terrific. Lee Pace, also wonderful in the fantastic The Fall, insinuates himself into another fairy-tale world as Ned the pie-maker who has the gift to resurrect dead things when he touches them, but if he touches them a second time they are dead again, forever. The other caveat is that if said dead thing is allowed to re-enter the world and exist for longer than a minute, something else in near proximity will have to die as a result. Anna Friel played his dead lady love, Chuck, who he resurrected but couldn’t bring himself to return to the grave. The two standouts of the show, though, were Chi McBride as the blustery private detective Emerson Cod (one of the most original characters I’ve seen in years) and Kristen Chenowith as the feisty, pining Olive Snook who works as a waitress at Ned’s cafe, charmingly called The Pie Hole. Daisies had begun pairing Cod and Snook together as sluething partners, but the cancellation came just as this storyline began to take off.

Now, for at least three more weeks, Daisies is alive and among us and well. Enjoy it while it lasts. It will be brief.

For everyone who has yet to see Daisies, you can get the first season on DVD and Bluray right now and the second season with the three added eps on July 1st.

Read what little ABC has to say about it HERE.

Grrrrr….Arrrrggh…Buffy heads to big screen without Whedon or Gellar

26 May

buffy

May 26th, 2009-

It’s been an interesting coincidence that as several of the new series reboots have been hitting theaters, I’ve been making my way through an old one for the first time. Having more or less yawned my way through the 1992 theatrical film Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and being underwhelmed by the t.v. pilot in winter of 97, I never watched the Joss Whedon helmed t.v. series of the same name. And, as I’ve come to realize in recent months, that was my loss.

Whedon created a strong cast of characters that formed a tight-knit community and as inventive as his monsters and fiends were, they always took a back seat to the woes of teenage high-school life. When the characters moved beyond high-school and took on college and the work-force, the show moved with them. It was constantly changing and shifting–not in tone, only in theme –and it was growing, not violently rearranging itself. What I see now, is that Buffy the Vampire Slayer, despite its groan-inducing title and long running stint on the teen-burial-ground that was the WB, was one of the best shows to ever grace the television screen. And as I watched Terminator and Star Trek get a new lease on life, I wondered if Whedon would ever see fit to give us a big-budget Buffy movie.

And, it looks like part of that wish is coming true, but the rest of it is so off-base I’d just as soon not have heard this. Buffy, it seems is going (back) to the big-screen, with the director of the awful first film at the helm and it’s proceeding forward without Whedon, Gellar, and the rest of the cast. O.k., so it won’t attempt to touch the t.v. series, which is a good thing, but this reboot doesn’t make much sense. I don’ t know if Whedon or Gellar or anyone else were approached about this, or considered it, but I always thought the purpose of a reboot was to improve or jump-start a franchise which had run out of steam. We already HAD the Buffy reboot, back in 97. That’s the version that has fans, not the 92 mess. And Buffy didn’t just fade out with lousy final seasons. It finished strong, and during it’s seven year run, only season 4 was not quite up to snuff. If I didn’t think Whedon couldn’t find another interesting story to tell with the original cast, fine, but I think he easily could. Right now, this sounds not only unnecessary but a heart-breaker for those fans of the show that were holding out hope that one day Buffy and the Scoobies would make their way to the big screen.

Bummer.

Read the Empire Online account of this travesty HERE.

 

‘V’ remake prepares to make contact–I hope theres a lizard baby!

20 May

v_tv_series

May 20th, 2009-

ABC has finally revealed a trailer for the pilot of its upcoming sci-fi series ‘V’, a remake of the 1983 miniseries of the same name. A ratings hit at the time, ‘V’ told the story of visitors from space who showed up in Earth’s atmosphere with their city-size saucers –suck it Independence Day!–and proceeded to aid the human race philanthropically. That was until we realized they were Nazi lizards determined to subjugate and harvest us.

As a child I remember catching bits of the debut and being haunted for weeks by the nasty little reptile baby. Anyone else remember that? The original miniseries hasn’t aged terribly well, but it’s still entertaining and it’s an opportunity to see earlier, less campy appearances by the likes of Marc Singer (Beastmaster!) and Robert “Freddy” Englund.

The new is gathering a bit of a genre cast itself, including Morena Baccarin of Firefly fame and Elizabeth Mitchell fresh from Lost. The production values look great, and the entire thing seems to have potential. I’m not a huge fan of remakes, but heres hoping they have another Battlestar Galactica here and not a Knight Rider or Bionic Woman. From the look of things, the humanoid iguana element is still in. Now I just hope for a rodent eating scene!

See the trailer HERE!

Five years down, and I’m still Lost (SPOILER warning)

14 May

lost-season5-cast-photo

“Ille qui nos omnes servabit.” — Richard Alpert speaking to Ilana next to the statue’s ruins.

Translation: “He who will save us all”

I’m just going to speak plainly on this one. What the Locke is going on??

That’s usually the response I have at the end of one of these season finales, but I honestly think this is the first one that threw me for a loop. Even the season 3 finale with the “game changing” ending was only surprising; the end of  tonight’s ‘The Incident’ was downright bewildering. Alot of us had guesses on John being in the coffin at the close of last year’s finale, but if anyone out there tonight figured out before the halfway mark that his body was in that box the “good guys” were carrying, give me your address and I’ll personally send you an autographed twinkie. It’s the first time the show really, truly blindsided me. Part of that is because it came at the end of such an engrossing and spirited two hours of television.

After a season that began with a compelling scenario but found plenty of opportunities to meander, last night’s finale really raised the stakes and expanded the scope. Going in to tonight there were a few questions I really expected to see answered–primarily what was in the temple, where the 815ers in 1977 went after their time in the Dharma Initiative, and who Jacob actually was. As far as I can surmise, the only one answered was the latter. The other two are obviously saved to next season. Even that answer only came in the form of meeting the actor, Mark Pelligrino(Dexter). And then there he is, sitting next to some new nemesis–Esau?–and waiting for The Black Rock to arrive on the island.

So, lets start there. Jacob and Esau; in the Bible they are the two sons of Isaac, and after the death of their father are forever embroiled in a conflict that comes as a result of the latter being decieved by the former into selling his birthright and being made subservient to his brother. Jacob, whose name in the Greek means “struggler with God”, eventually settled in the Land of Goshen, in Egypt. So, how closely does this Jacob relate to the biblical man? Clearly the struggle between the show’s Jacob and his Esau bear alot of similarities to the biblical relationship.

So, now there’s a central conflict between two characters we haven’t met before. How do they tie into the several divisions and conflicts that already exist in the show? The Dharma Initiative vs. The Hostiles. The Others vs. the Castaways. The Man of Science vs. The Man of Faith. The temporal vs. the eternal. The show provides a few more clues closely tied to the spiritual side of things.

Jacob visits Locke, Sun, Jin, Jack, Kate, Sawyer and Hurley at various, integral times in their lives and provides little shoves that, I assume, are designed to ensure their arrival back on the island. He seemingly goes as far as bringing Locke back to life, but not to complete health. He’s playing with their lives in such a way that it calls their “destiny” into question. Romans 9:10(NASB) says:

10 And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11 for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, 12 it was said to her, “THE OLDER WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER.” 13 Just as it is written, “JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED.”

This passage of scripture has often been cited to suggest the sovreign and pre-destined nature of God and of a universe ruled by God. Jacob and Esau are set on two different paths before their birth, and God’s attitude towards the two is determined before then as well. Later in the book, it is stated:

19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20 On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21 Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.

So, where is Lost going in regards to fate and free will? Jacob in this instance seems to be the one doing the molding, shaping the vessels of Locke, Jack and the others so that move in certain directions, sometimes choosing honor and sometimes choosing dishonor. But can any of it be changed? Is Jacob a man, with special abilities, or is he something more? I’ve always rejected the notion that Lost would venture into the supernatural or mystical, but it appears now that perhaps it is headed in that direction.

Those passages above have been interpreted in many ways by many different scholars, and one of the arguments regarding the idea of a God who predetermines the fate of man centers around whether or not that God actually crafts the eventual path of the individual or merely has omniscience in the face of space and time and can observe what that individual will do and adjusts his attitude towards that one accordingly.

Without making this a theological throw-down, I think that idea is central to the eventual revelation and ultimate theme of LOST as a show. All of the 815ers were more than just physically lost at the start of the show, they were also adrift in their own individual ways. Now, the issues of destiny, purpose and individual importance rest at the center of the entire story. There are several forces that have no reconciliation-The DI and the Hostiles and Jacob and his dark counterpart. Are the castaways being molded as the vessells of reconciliation for the Island? Can time be changed? Which theory of Faraday’s is right? Or, do both apply at different times?

The second clue to the spiritual conflict in LOST is the book of Jacob’s choice in last night’s episode. He is reading a collection of short stories by Flannery O’Connor entitled Everything that Rises Must Converge. O’Connor was a southern author born in 1925 and dying in Georgia in 1964 from complications with Lupus. O’Connor, passing on when she was only 39, was a devout Catholic and battled illness all her life. As a result, her work, especially her short stories were filled with religious symbolism and divine intervention but they were done in a way that was disarming to most readers. O’Connor revealed spiritual and transforming truths to her characters in often violent and brutal ways.

Most stories combine elements that pop-up frequently in Lost: the protagonist(if there can be such a thing in an O’Connor story) encounters an outsider, often dark, mysterious and with questionable motives, and the mash-up that ensues proves transcendent for the former. Problem is, they usually die or lose their false leg or something equally dark. O’Connor saw the spiritual work of transforming the soul as a violent ripping from the secular, temporal world. That’s been going on in Lost since day one. An O’Connor story might end with a whole family slaughtered by a killer, but the moment that is supposed to catch us involves the potential redemption of the killer himself. In her world, potential innocents were guilty, and the guilty hardly ever beyond salvation. Remind you of anything?

So, those seem to be the spiritual stakes, but what about Locke? I didn’t see the imposter Locke thread coming, and in some ways it’s kind of cool but I was disappointed to think that the real Locke might actually be out of the story. I hope that’s not the case, as I’d hate to leave the real John at the moment of desperation, broken and strangled to death by Ben. As it happens, I don’t think we have seen the end of the real John Locke. Does this mean a Locke vs. Locke showdown next season? While it sounds kind of Highlander-ish, I’m game.

A few more thoughts before we go:

Someone needs to kill the character of Stuart. I was sure we’d see him go, but he’s still there. He reminds me of a feral Bob Balaban. This is not a good thing.

Juliette leaves the show, but she gets not one but two exits–one all Gandalf, the other all Bruce Willis ala Armageddon. Not too shabby Juliette, not too shabby at all. Your cold, sardonic stare will be missed.

Jack is directly in John’s shoes now. I like that he tells Richard “Don’t give up on him.” I hope Jack gets a chance to tell the real John about it.

Jack vs. Sawyer. This fight has been brewing since season one, but when it happens jack and sawyer are actually closer as people then they were previously. Neat. I really like the way the show has grown Sawyer. It’s great, subtle work transforming someone from callow to wise in the space of a few years. Whedon did it with the Spike character on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but the work here doesn’t rely upon magics or sudden turns of behavior, but on experience and the interaction of a community. Sawyer’s transformation is completely real.

Rose and Bernard. Perfectly sweet. Is Bernard turning into Jerry Garcia? If we never see this couple again, that’s just as well. That was a PERFECT coda for them. I think it was the strongest bit of the episode.

 Sobek. The repairer of evil that has been caused. Interesting. In fact, if you take a look at Egyptian mythology in general, in particular the Book of the Dead, you might be fascinated by the similarities with Lost.

Finally, my theory. The trapped ghost in the cabin is not Jacob, but Esau–held trapped by that ring of ash, and now there is a break in it. An actual loophole, as referred to by the characters twice. What he is exactly, I don’t know, but Esau imprints on Locke in that ep. We see a figure sitting in a chair, and it looks sort of like Locke or Christian Shepherd. My guess is that it was Locke, and it stole his form when his body returned to the island. Does this mean, that somehow Esau and the smoke monster are related, or the same entity? The very first episode involves Locke discussing the two sides of everything to Walt. Light and dark. Always two sides. We have our sides ladies and gentleman.

But seriously, the real Locke better come back.