Five years down, and I’m still Lost (SPOILER warning)

14 May


“Ille qui nos omnes servabit.” — Richard Alpert speaking to Ilana next to the statue’s ruins.

Translation: “He who will save us all”

I’m just going to speak plainly on this one. What the Locke is going on??

That’s usually the response I have at the end of one of these season finales, but I honestly think this is the first one that threw me for a loop. Even the season 3 finale with the “game changing” ending was only surprising; the end of  tonight’s ‘The Incident’ was downright bewildering. Alot of us had guesses on John being in the coffin at the close of last year’s finale, but if anyone out there tonight figured out before the halfway mark that his body was in that box the “good guys” were carrying, give me your address and I’ll personally send you an autographed twinkie. It’s the first time the show really, truly blindsided me. Part of that is because it came at the end of such an engrossing and spirited two hours of television.

After a season that began with a compelling scenario but found plenty of opportunities to meander, last night’s finale really raised the stakes and expanded the scope. Going in to tonight there were a few questions I really expected to see answered–primarily what was in the temple, where the 815ers in 1977 went after their time in the Dharma Initiative, and who Jacob actually was. As far as I can surmise, the only one answered was the latter. The other two are obviously saved to next season. Even that answer only came in the form of meeting the actor, Mark Pelligrino(Dexter). And then there he is, sitting next to some new nemesis–Esau?–and waiting for The Black Rock to arrive on the island.

So, lets start there. Jacob and Esau; in the Bible they are the two sons of Isaac, and after the death of their father are forever embroiled in a conflict that comes as a result of the latter being decieved by the former into selling his birthright and being made subservient to his brother. Jacob, whose name in the Greek means “struggler with God”, eventually settled in the Land of Goshen, in Egypt. So, how closely does this Jacob relate to the biblical man? Clearly the struggle between the show’s Jacob and his Esau bear alot of similarities to the biblical relationship.

So, now there’s a central conflict between two characters we haven’t met before. How do they tie into the several divisions and conflicts that already exist in the show? The Dharma Initiative vs. The Hostiles. The Others vs. the Castaways. The Man of Science vs. The Man of Faith. The temporal vs. the eternal. The show provides a few more clues closely tied to the spiritual side of things.

Jacob visits Locke, Sun, Jin, Jack, Kate, Sawyer and Hurley at various, integral times in their lives and provides little shoves that, I assume, are designed to ensure their arrival back on the island. He seemingly goes as far as bringing Locke back to life, but not to complete health. He’s playing with their lives in such a way that it calls their “destiny” into question. Romans 9:10(NASB) says:

10 And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; 11 for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, 12 it was said to her, “THE OLDER WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER.” 13 Just as it is written, “JACOB I LOVED, BUT ESAU I HATED.”

This passage of scripture has often been cited to suggest the sovreign and pre-destined nature of God and of a universe ruled by God. Jacob and Esau are set on two different paths before their birth, and God’s attitude towards the two is determined before then as well. Later in the book, it is stated:

19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20 On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21 Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles.

So, where is Lost going in regards to fate and free will? Jacob in this instance seems to be the one doing the molding, shaping the vessels of Locke, Jack and the others so that move in certain directions, sometimes choosing honor and sometimes choosing dishonor. But can any of it be changed? Is Jacob a man, with special abilities, or is he something more? I’ve always rejected the notion that Lost would venture into the supernatural or mystical, but it appears now that perhaps it is headed in that direction.

Those passages above have been interpreted in many ways by many different scholars, and one of the arguments regarding the idea of a God who predetermines the fate of man centers around whether or not that God actually crafts the eventual path of the individual or merely has omniscience in the face of space and time and can observe what that individual will do and adjusts his attitude towards that one accordingly.

Without making this a theological throw-down, I think that idea is central to the eventual revelation and ultimate theme of LOST as a show. All of the 815ers were more than just physically lost at the start of the show, they were also adrift in their own individual ways. Now, the issues of destiny, purpose and individual importance rest at the center of the entire story. There are several forces that have no reconciliation-The DI and the Hostiles and Jacob and his dark counterpart. Are the castaways being molded as the vessells of reconciliation for the Island? Can time be changed? Which theory of Faraday’s is right? Or, do both apply at different times?

The second clue to the spiritual conflict in LOST is the book of Jacob’s choice in last night’s episode. He is reading a collection of short stories by Flannery O’Connor entitled Everything that Rises Must Converge. O’Connor was a southern author born in 1925 and dying in Georgia in 1964 from complications with Lupus. O’Connor, passing on when she was only 39, was a devout Catholic and battled illness all her life. As a result, her work, especially her short stories were filled with religious symbolism and divine intervention but they were done in a way that was disarming to most readers. O’Connor revealed spiritual and transforming truths to her characters in often violent and brutal ways.

Most stories combine elements that pop-up frequently in Lost: the protagonist(if there can be such a thing in an O’Connor story) encounters an outsider, often dark, mysterious and with questionable motives, and the mash-up that ensues proves transcendent for the former. Problem is, they usually die or lose their false leg or something equally dark. O’Connor saw the spiritual work of transforming the soul as a violent ripping from the secular, temporal world. That’s been going on in Lost since day one. An O’Connor story might end with a whole family slaughtered by a killer, but the moment that is supposed to catch us involves the potential redemption of the killer himself. In her world, potential innocents were guilty, and the guilty hardly ever beyond salvation. Remind you of anything?

So, those seem to be the spiritual stakes, but what about Locke? I didn’t see the imposter Locke thread coming, and in some ways it’s kind of cool but I was disappointed to think that the real Locke might actually be out of the story. I hope that’s not the case, as I’d hate to leave the real John at the moment of desperation, broken and strangled to death by Ben. As it happens, I don’t think we have seen the end of the real John Locke. Does this mean a Locke vs. Locke showdown next season? While it sounds kind of Highlander-ish, I’m game.

A few more thoughts before we go:

Someone needs to kill the character of Stuart. I was sure we’d see him go, but he’s still there. He reminds me of a feral Bob Balaban. This is not a good thing.

Juliette leaves the show, but she gets not one but two exits–one all Gandalf, the other all Bruce Willis ala Armageddon. Not too shabby Juliette, not too shabby at all. Your cold, sardonic stare will be missed.

Jack is directly in John’s shoes now. I like that he tells Richard “Don’t give up on him.” I hope Jack gets a chance to tell the real John about it.

Jack vs. Sawyer. This fight has been brewing since season one, but when it happens jack and sawyer are actually closer as people then they were previously. Neat. I really like the way the show has grown Sawyer. It’s great, subtle work transforming someone from callow to wise in the space of a few years. Whedon did it with the Spike character on Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but the work here doesn’t rely upon magics or sudden turns of behavior, but on experience and the interaction of a community. Sawyer’s transformation is completely real.

Rose and Bernard. Perfectly sweet. Is Bernard turning into Jerry Garcia? If we never see this couple again, that’s just as well. That was a PERFECT coda for them. I think it was the strongest bit of the episode.

 Sobek. The repairer of evil that has been caused. Interesting. In fact, if you take a look at Egyptian mythology in general, in particular the Book of the Dead, you might be fascinated by the similarities with Lost.

Finally, my theory. The trapped ghost in the cabin is not Jacob, but Esau–held trapped by that ring of ash, and now there is a break in it. An actual loophole, as referred to by the characters twice. What he is exactly, I don’t know, but Esau imprints on Locke in that ep. We see a figure sitting in a chair, and it looks sort of like Locke or Christian Shepherd. My guess is that it was Locke, and it stole his form when his body returned to the island. Does this mean, that somehow Esau and the smoke monster are related, or the same entity? The very first episode involves Locke discussing the two sides of everything to Walt. Light and dark. Always two sides. We have our sides ladies and gentleman.

But seriously, the real Locke better come back.


One Response to “Five years down, and I’m still Lost (SPOILER warning)”

  1. Xiphos June 27, 2009 at 2:41 pm #

    This past seson of Lost was wretched. It went down the BSG road of meandering and watr treading. They should have ended Lost this season instead of next season.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: