Movie Review: Star Trek Boldly Begins

8 May






“I’ve waited for this day all my life…This day of reckoning”

cinemagrade A-The above quote is spoken by the Romulan warrior Nero in JJ Abrams new reboot of the Star Trek franchise, but I think I also heard it whispered among the Trekkies sitting in front of me as the lights went down and the Paramount logo came up tonight. Yea, no doubt about it. This was a big one for all parties involved. My wife and I don’t hail from the land of the Trek maniacs, but we are among the Losties, a group no less geeky than our star faring brethren but perhaps more culturally acceptable (at least for now). Give it 40 years, 5 series, and 11 films and then see how many of us are walking around with shaved heads and carrying large hunting knives.  Either way, whether you were rooting for JJ or Roddenberry or keeping your fingers crossed for a Shatner Priceline tie-in, we were all holding out for a winner. And it delivered. Big time.

It’s been a long time since we have had a truly great, epic space opera. The Star Wars prequels, while not nearly as bad as the current consensus would have them, were at best entertaining distractions with poorly constructed narratives and clunky, numbing dialogue. At worst, they were dramatically hollow in the places where they should have been brimming with passion and heart. Abrams’ Star Trek changes all of that with a film that is far more boldly conceived than any of its franchise predecessors. It does three things amazingly well: it tells a solid, interesting story, it builds onto and accentuates an inspiring and expansive universe, and it draws out of its leads terrific performances that truly give their characters emotional weight and reality.


 The new movie begins immediately with an unknown Romulan warship tearing its way out of an anomalous lightning storm. When it does so, a small federation starship challenges it, the Romulan captain demands to know the whereabouts of a Mr. Spock, and eventually one young first officer is thrust into the position of captain and does the only thing he can do to buy the evacuating crew the time they need to escape. He rams his ship into the Romulan destroyer, and sacrifices his life for the others, who happen to include his wife and newly born son, James Tiberius Kirk. And like that, the entire Trek universe has been reinvented.

That opening scene is really something else. It sketches in details with speed and efficiency. The production design gives us ships and technology that are sleek and metallic, but a bit retro. We can believe that this world is a relatively young, burgeoning future where the Federation is still getting its legs and learning how to best monitor the galaxy. George Kirk, Jim’s father, is only in the film for a few moments but instead of being a shadowy legend we get to see him being a reluctant, but determined hero. His sacrifice means something, only five minutes in. And it really does change things dramatically for the film.

See, the James Kirk of the previous films knew his father, was prompted by his father to join Starfleet and had all the benefits of a structured upbringing with a nurturing figure that loved him and inspired him. The James Kirk of this film does not. When Nero’s ship enters the picture, everything that would have happened in that timeline is knocked off its base: fighting Khan, saving the whales, throwing down with God, and everything else is no longer a certainty. Every character is freed up to go wherever this particular story takes them, although they still possess the same traits and spirit of those original characters. And then, there is Spock.


Or rather, there are two Spocks; the younger and the older. Abrams, trotting out the elements of fate, destiny and providence that come up so frequently on Lost uses Leonard Nimoy as the delivery boy of those same themes here. And Nimoy doesn’t disappoint. He slips into this character as if he had never left it, and he brings a greater sensitivity and world weariness to Spock. Add to that Quinto’s more impassioned, even arrogant portrayal as he actually wages a tug of war with his two disparate lineages and you have a classic character fleshed out in ways he never was before. The idea of the logical, emotionless alien who harbors human feelings has become a cliché since Star Trek debuted. It doesn’t feel stale though, and the writing and the acting are the primary reasons why.

The acting is uniformly strong all across the cast. Chris Pine has perhaps a job even more difficult than Quinto whose biggest hurdle is trying to suggest that he could ever become Nimoy in any potential future. Pine has to embody Kirk the character, shrug off the idiosyncrasies of Shatner the actor and suggest the differences in this alternate Kirk. If it sounds confusing to read, then imagine what a challenge it would be to actually convey that. Still, that’s exactly what happens. This isn’t Star Trek 90210 or Muppet Babies in Space. We aren’t just seeing a cool, hip, snarky version of Shatner’s more romantic, literature loving captain. Pine gives a layered performance that starts with the attitude but goes all the way through. It’s not an impersonation. It’s a whole new creation, and it’s a believable one. I’m looking forward to what Pine will do with other roles, and what he will do with this role in the future.

new-trekkie-photoAbrams pits Kirk and Spock against each other early on and the rest of the characters get to spin in their orbit a bit. This supporting crew doesn’t get the same development they did in the earlier films. Scotty and Bones make out the best. Pegg shows up late, and provides hearty doses of comic relief that aren’t manic, but simply bemused, which is in keeping with Doohan’s portrayal.  Karl Urban is the winner amongst the cast for being closest to his original character while looking nothing like him. Bones is probably the character least affected by the changes in the continuum, and it shows.

If I have made it all sound like imitation than I have betrayed the movie’s accomplishment. The characters are interesting to us initially because we know them, but satisfying to us later because they manage to surprise. There are consequences and stakes, and that is hardly ever true of a “prequel” because we always know how it ends up. Characters may go through a series of hoops where they jump differently, but they always have to land in the place we left them. This movie isn’t saddled with that. At any moment, we could have a moment like the one at the end of Wrath of Khan. Anything is possible.


Eric Bana as Nero is another strong point. Bana as an actor is an odd presence on film. Sometimes he can be very dynamic, especially in villainous roles (see Chopper) and yet so often it seems that he sleepwalks through his performances. Nero isn’t an emperor or a skilled warrior. In the future he comes from he was really just a blue collar worker; a miner who was affected deeply by a galactic tragedy. He’s a ball of seething rage and bitter drive thinly masked by his own self righteous sense of “justice”. Bana gets that, and he channels every physical and emotional trait of the character through that idea.

For all of the great acting and intelligent writing, the movie isn’t a serious affair or a particularly literary endeavor. The plot is classic space opera, with massive coincidences and clandestine meetings and a few dues ex machinas, even if God himself doesn’t show up demanding a starship. The script has been banged together into a vehicle just suitable enough for making those hyper jumps to the film’s climax without flying apart before the thing ends. And that’s all it really needs to be. It paves the way for numerous action scenes that are staged with imagination and a sense of space and logical motion. No herky jerky camera work, although the lilting movement during the space battles is almost vertigo inducing and that’s as it should be.


Despite the superb effects, wonderfully odd creatures (loved the green skinned girl, the ice planet’s giant insectoid, and the cabbage midget) and rousing battles,  the heart of the movie are its characters and ideas. Star Trek always imagined a universe where mankind was seeking to better itself, to move beyond its more base natures and come into its own unique destiny. This new film posits that each individual has his own destiny that sits outside of one race or one civilizations’ overarching path, and in the moment it is our understanding of our place and the choices we make that define that. Forty some years after it first struck out on that mission, Star Trek is still boldly exploring those ideas, and in some ways, better than it ever has before.

Star Trek isn’t just one of the best summer movies I’ve come across in some time; it’s also the best space adventure I’ve seen in ages. The only thing that prevents it from getting a 5 star rating is the fact that it never quite makes the leap into the truly dramatic or spectacular. There are no moments as awing as the creation of the Genesis planet or as emotionally disarming as the death of Spock. What it does it does wonderfully, and it’s far better than I would have ever expected it to be. It’s so good in fact, that it isn’t a far stretch to wish it had been just that little bit of extra that would have rendered it extraordinary. Still, it accomplishes something few movies have done for me in a while. It generates that gnawing urge to see it again, as soon as possible. Bravo, Star Trek. Live long and prosper.


10 Responses to “Movie Review: Star Trek Boldly Begins”

  1. Jen B May 8, 2009 at 1:12 pm #

    Excellent review! You’re right on! They pulled all of the “right” attributes from the original cast making it satisfying for fans and enjoyable for first time viewers. We’ve been well overdue for a good space opera.

  2. Rachel May 8, 2009 at 5:05 pm #

    First of all from now on I will refer to Captain Kirk as “Chew face”. Why you may ask? Because the poor young chap, already marred with pock marks and facial scars takes more face beatings than anyone Ive ever seen! He remains in a continual state of grisly, bruised, swollen, at times blood smeared face mutilation. I kept rubbing my nose and lips as if I could feel the smashings myself.

    Spock both young and old were awesome! I loved that story line and the acting on both parts. Well done!

    Scottie, Chekov, Bones and the Asian dude were all greatly acted and portrayed as well. Very enjoyable characters. Even though I’m barely familiar with the originals I was still able to pick up on the trait similarities from old and new and was highly entertained on many levels.

    Effects were awesome, musical score was excellent, and I loved the balance of humor, action, and drama..very well done!

    At first I was a little nervous that this was going to follow all popular films of current which it the obnoxiously rebellious boy of a dysfunctional upbringing, saves the world with his arrogance and practices just enough humility and sexiness to claim the girl as well however…

    I was very pleased that this didn’t turn into a teenie bopper Jonas Brothers, twilight rendition of a cult classic. They did a good job incorporating enough to draw audiences of young, teenage and old followers. It has all the explosions and bad boy qualities for the fast and furious/transformers crowd but enough of a good story line and quality acting to appeal to trekies and appreciaters of good cinema.

    However as a side note I will add that the young Spock was one tasty little Vulkan (however you spell it) step aside yummy tum tumnus -sorry I just had to say it

    Except for the ear drum shredding volume level of the theater I really enjoyed it and as you said in your blog its the first movie in a long while that Ive seen in the theater that made me want to go see it again.

    All around a great movie… however it left me with lots of questions concerning the future of Star Trek how is this massive altering of time going to coincide with the old movies? Or should I not think about it as this is a brand new series of movies meant to tell their own version? How can there be two Spocks living at once continually? Even if they kill off the old one, then won’t he have lived two lifetimes? I kept waiting to a black hole to suck everything back to the beginning and clean it all up, but I knew that that would eliminate the new crew, the new story line and the ability to make more films.

    I found it to be very enjoyable as it had all the makings of a great film, likeable characters, science fiction, action, drama, humor (the cabbage midget was awesome!) and a good story to boot. I give it 4.5 stars as well!

    Anyways despite all the questions, it was a great movie and I will be first in line for the next if there are more. However I will probably go to another theater since that last 2-3 times Ive gone to White Marsh the sound has been so loud it was painful and took away from the film.

  3. Ron Furrow May 8, 2009 at 5:29 pm #

    The problem I have with the Movie is that it totally does not line up with original series. They destroyed Vulcan and practically wiped out the Vulcan race this totally changes everything. One thing never Kirk & Spock never saw Spock of the future! If there is no plant Vulcan would never be a need for Vulcan ambassadors. Do how many peace treaties Vulcan’s made between so different systems throughout the galaxy. There would be no ambassador Spock. Spock would never have been on the next generation. It also messes with the Wrath of Caan and The return of Spock movies. These are major differences and just few that I think of off the top of my head. Don’t get me wrong the action was great. I think the actors did a great job with characters. I don’t mind minor changes, but changes they made effects almost everything. The Vulcan’s have too many references in every series since then, including Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and made since!

    • Bartleby May 8, 2009 at 6:22 pm #

      Well, I think that was one of the things I really liked. They could have just made a completely new Trek that pretended the other movies didn’t happen, but instead they have started an alternate universe where things are different so that future movies won’t be predictable. They don’t have to be held to cannon for this series because it isn’t the same Trek universe anymore; it’s an alternate reality, but it doesn’t take away from the original universe. We already know those adventures. They made up the OST, and the first six movies. We don’t know what happens next in the world they set up in this movie. It’s fresh from here on out, but they get to use the old crew. Kind of brilliant in it’s own way. They honor the original fans and set up a franchise to bring in new ones.

  4. The Great Fatsby May 18, 2009 at 3:57 pm #

    It took me a week, but I finally got around to seeing this masterful version of Star Trek. Really, they do almost beat the viewer in the head with the alternate universe aspect, so I don’t believe this destroys or even slightly tarnishes the continuum of the series.

    I agree with Bartleby’s review all the way to the bitter end, with the minor exception of not giving this 5 stars. I’m giving the extra half star just for the simple fact that they had a random Starfleet guy go out on a mission, in a red space suit, with predictable results. That and the green chick. Oh yeah.

  5. legitnews November 21, 2009 at 7:00 pm #

    This movie is UH MAY ZING.

    What they need to do is go remake TOS and make it relevant for todays generation. The scripts from 40 years ago still outperform the majority of whats on tv today, like the flashforward stupidity, how did that get greenlit? Basing an entire series off of something like a world wide mass black out where you see the future is gimmicky at best

  6. Marta Lucia Aziz December 2, 2009 at 6:51 am #



  7. SFX January 4, 2010 at 10:02 am #

    Completely concur, this movie is a real success. Had been terrified of it, but they did a sterling job all over. Look forward to getting more drama as they settle into their stride, they must have all been very, very scared what all the gazillions of StarTrek fans had to say to about it! Well I’m one and I say, well done, too.

  8. xiphos0311 February 16, 2010 at 4:12 am #

    ST is considered good? I’ve sen twice and I couldn’t tell you a thing about it good or bad.


  1. Star Trek Vulkanier - February 15, 2010

    […] Movie Review: Star Trek Boldly Begins « Cinematropolis […]

Leave a Reply to legitnews Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: